Thursday, January 23, 2014
The widening gap between economic losses and insured losses from natural catastrophes is our topic du jour.
Guy Carpenter’s GCCapitalIdeas.com just published thisÂ chart showing that approximately 70 percent of global economic losses from natural catastrophes were uninsured between 1980 and 2013:
Another compelling chart shows how small a proportion of catastrophe losses were insured in both advanced and emerging markets between 2002 and 2011:
Munich ReÂ just reportedÂ that economic losses from natural catastrophes worldwide in 2013 amounted to around $125 billion and insured lossesÂ around $31 billion. This compared withÂ economic losses of $160 billion andÂ insured losses of $65 billion reported by Munich ReÂ in 2012.
According to aÂ recent post over atÂ Artemis blog, this means that just over 40 percent of economic losses from natural catastrophes were insured in 2012, while in 2013 that percentage was significantly lower at 25 percent.
Artemis blog’s take on this disparity:
The reason for this is likely that losses were more widely distributed around the world, in 2012 90% of insured losses were in the U.S. (compared to just 54% in 2013). The lack of hurricanes, a well covered risk typically with high insured to economic loss ratios and the fact that as a market the U.S. has one of the greatest insurance penetrations for property cover, as well as hurricane Sandyâ€™s impact.”.
The Guy Carpenter charts also point to a growing need for coverage to protect against catastrophesÂ in both advancedÂ and emerging markets.