Tag Archives: Liability Insurance

Pushback continues against ALI restatement of liability insurance

In May 2018, the American Law Institute (ALI) gave final approval to its “Restatement of Law, Liability Insurance.” Portions of the restatement continue to prove controversial, and state legislators have begun pushing back against it.

The ALI is an independent organization of legal professionals that seeks to clarify and simplify U.S. case law to help judges in their decisions. To this end, the ALI publishes a variety of materials that describe what the case law says in various areas, including insurance. One of the materials the ALI publishes is called a “restatement of law,” which attempts to describe common law and its statutory elements. It’s basically a way for judges to know where the law currently stands on a variety of issues.

The latest restatement addresses liability insurance and includes provisions that have met with vocal opposition from state legislatures, the insurance industry, and lawyers. These include, among other things, possible changes to how insurance policies can be interpreted; how coverages are triggered for “long-tail” claims (claims that can last for many years, like environmental losses); and how an insurer might be held responsible for breaching its duty to defend.

Opponents argue that some provisions of the restatement could fundamentally – and improperly – change how liability law operates. That in so changing liability law, the restatement arrogates powers to regulate insurance that properly belong to state legislatures. That many aspects of the restatement do not accurately reflect current state case law and weigh the scales against the legal rights of insurance companies. That portions of the restatement are less a description of law than they are a “wish list” for what the law should be.

Others have called these criticisms of the restatement unfounded or have sought a more balanced response to its changes.

But regardless of who is right, state legislatures have begun to act against the restatement. The National Conference of Insurance Legislators has come out against it. Arkansas, Michigan, North Dakota, Ohio, Tennessee, and Texas have all recently passed legislation that in some form seeks to curtail or condemn the use of the restatement under their respective insurance laws. The Kentucky and Indiana legislatures have also passed resolutions stating their opposition to the ALI’s restatement.

How this will all shake out remains to be seen: will the restatement of law for liability insurance begin to make its mark in case law? Will legislation against the restatement continue to spread? Only time will tell.

Big nasty claims in the casualty sector

On June 12, Advisen held a webinar entitled “Big nasty claims. What are the large loss trends in the casualty sector?” To qualify as big and nasty, the casualty claims stem from injury and/or property damage resulting from incidents such as train derailments, chemical spills and food contamination, frequently involving multiple parties, and costing $100 million or more each.

Advisen’s large loss dataset yielded some interesting insights into trends in this area, and Jim Blinn, Advisen’s moderator, was joined by two Allied World claims experts, James Minniti and Paul DeGiulio.

Advisen’s dataset reveals that pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturing, transportation equipment manufacturing, and machinery and electronics manufacturing are the top three industries involved in large claims, with public administration in fourth place.

Railroad accidents and derailments, a frequent source of large claims, are attractive to the plaintiffs’ bar because the technology is often available to have prevented the accident, but has not been implemented, said the panel.

Concussion litigation, another source of big claims, contains many coverage issues and coverage litigation is happening concurrently with trials. The National College Athletic Association has its first concussion trial this week, and a lot of people will be watching as the organization is expected to be a target for more lawsuits. Concussion injury defendants also include colleges and high schools.

When it comes to predicting which lawsuits may results in large claims, James Minniti said that looking at the plaintiffs’ lawyer’s name is a good bet, “you can be reasonably sure it’s going to be a bad case” if a certain top-notch plaintiffs’ attorney or firm is involved. Paul DeGiulio added that the venue is also important, for lawsuits tried in Philadelphia or Los Angeles the cost could be much higher.

 

 

 

 

Sugar: The Next Tobacco?

Is sugar the next tobacco? Liability insurance experts say it could be.

Excessive, but not always obvious use of sugar (also salt) in food has the potential for systemic loss, a recent Lloyd’s report found.

The potential loss scenario unfolds if excessive levels of sugar are found to be harmful by scientific studies and if courts find food producers and/or the distribution chain liable for resulting damages.

“A societal shift may make the addition of significant amounts of sugar to our food unacceptable, with liability risks affecting food manufacturers (and possibly distributors and retailers).”

A sample footprint in the report (below), starting from sugar beet and cane farming to sugar and confectionary manufacturing and spreading to various other food manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers, and food and drink outlets shows the widespread distribution of sugar and the potential impact on many customers:

“Historical data suggests that the spread would also be amplified by the presence of large corporates with large insurance cover and funds.”

Businesses address their liability concerns through many types of risk management, of which insurance is an important component, according to the Insurance Information Institute.

A Swiss Re study indicated that the United States in 2013 had the largest commercial liability insurance market in the world both in premium volume ($84 billion) and as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (0.50 percent).

‘Tis The Season…For Lawsuits

In true holiday spirit we just got our kids to the mall to see Santa this week. Its an annual tradition, a visit that helps keep the magic alive in our all-too-knowing six and four-year olds’ minds and more importantly yields the holiday photo that keeps on giving throughout the years.

Every year Santa faces a barrage of questions. This year was no different. Our six year-old started: “Santa, I have a question. How come you know I want a two-wheeled scooter?”

Luckily, the letter from the North Pole had arrived a few days earlier telling him he had made the Nice List and that Santa knew from our elf Chippy just what he was wishing for.

This was confirmed by Santa at the mall who said: “Because you’ve been good and it’s magic.”

But what if the conversation had gone a different way?

Sometimes magic confronts reality and a lawsuit ensues, reminding us what’s at stake for Santa and the mall this Christmas.

Take this post over at Randy Spencer’s Open Mic published in the latest issue of online newsletter Coverage Opinions (edited by attorney Randy Maniloff of White and Williams LLP)

In the post, Court Holds a Mail Santa Liable: Damages Owed For Failure To Deliver A Toy Fire Truck, Randy Spencer – the only stand-up comic to specialize in insurance – tells of a Montana trial court that found a mall and its Santa liable for a child’s emotional injuries after promising a toy that was not left under the tree come Christmas Day.

How much damages did the court award in this case? $95,000.

All of which is a timely reminder that Santa (and the malls that embrace the Christmas spirit) need insurance too.

Which is why the Insurance Information Institute (I.I.I.) urges St. Nick to review his insurance policies to be sure he’s got the right insurance coverage with its Santa’s Insurance Wish List.

And we suggest the I.I.I.’s business insurance checklist would make a great stocking stuffer in this case.

All the best for a happy and safe holiday season!