Aviation Terror Threat

Since we blogged a few days ago about terrorism insurance take-up rising in the U.S. two further reports have been published confirming the trend of improving availability and affordability of coverage under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA). First, a RAND Corp study finds that TRIA effects are most positive for a conventional attack, with expected costs to taxpayers in this scenario lower with TRIA than without. Then a study from Guy Carpenter points to an emerging global aviation market issue – whether losses to aircraft hulls, passengers and third parties arising from weapons of mass destruction (WMD) should be government risks or commercial market risks. As airlines are required to have passenger and third-party liability insurance cover to receive landing rights, the cancellation of coverage could threaten to bring about a complete shutdown of the aviation industry. While the U.S. government currently provides U.S. air carriers with passenger and crew liability, hull war risk and third-party liability cover, the report notes that since 2002 most other government schemes have been withdrawn and replaced by commercial cover. I.I.I. has further aviation information available online.  Ã‚  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *