The unanimous decision by a federal appeals court to uphold a finding by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that greenhouse gases endanger public health and can be regulated under the Clean Air Act is drawing a wide range of responses in the media.
The New York Times reports that in addition to upholding the E.P.A.Ã¢â‚¬â„¢s so-called endangerment finding, the three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia let stand related rules setting limits on greenhouse gas emissions from cars and limiting emissions from stationary sources.
The Wall Street Journal describes the decision as a blow to the coal industry and other companies, noting that he court gave the EPA almost everything it wanted in the 82-page ruling.
According to Wonkblog at the Washington Post this is what the decision means:
For one, the EPA will finish up drafting standards requiring cars and light trucks to get a fleet-wide average fuel economy of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. And the agency can move forward with its rules limiting carbon pollution from new power plants. Next up: The agency has to decide whether to place carbon limits on existing power plants, as well as whether to regulate other major sources of pollution such as oil refineries or cement plants.Ã¢â‚¬