 |
|
              
    
    
|
|
INSURANCE |
|
 |
 |
PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURANCE
 Property/casualty insurance covers the property and liability losses of businesses and individuals. These losses range from damage and injuries resulting from car accidents to the cost of lawsuits stemming from faulty products and alleged professional misconduct. In terms of premiums written, private auto insurance is by far the largest single line, nearly four times greater than the next largest line, homeowners multiple peril. Property/casualty insurance companies tend to specialize in commercial or personal insurance, but some sell both, and a number of companies are expanding into other financial services sectors, including personal banking and mutual funds.
Property/casualty insurers invest largely in high-quality liquid securities, which can be sold quickly to pay for claims resulting from a major hurricane, earthquake or man-made disaster such as a terrorist attack.
|  |
 |
PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURER FINANCIAL ASSET DISTRIBUTION, 2003-2007
 ($ billions)

|  |
 |
CAPITAL AND SURPLUS
 A property/casualty insurer must maintain a certain level of surplus to underwrite risks. This financial cushion is known as “capacity” or policyholders' surplus. When the industry is hit by high losses, such as a major hurricane, capacity is diminished. It can be restored by increases in net income, favorable investment returns, reinsuring more risk and/or raising additional capital. The industry's policyholders' surplus reached $499.4 billion at year-end 2006, according to Highline Data.
Property/casualty insurers rarely show an overall underwriting profit, i.e., a net gain from premiums after costs of sales, dividends to policyholders, loss payments and loss adjustment costs (which include litigation costs). When the combined ratio (costs as a percentage of premiums) is over 100, the difference is generally covered by investment income from a number of sources, including capital and surplus accounts, money set aside for loss reserves and unearned premium reserves, and capital gains. In 2006 the combined ratio was 92.5 after dividends, which means insurers paid out 92.5 cents for every dollar in earned premium. The 2006 combined ratio was the best since 1949 and stands tied for the fifth best result since 1920.
|  |
 |
PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURANCE INDUSTRY INCOME ANALYSIS, 2002-2006 (1)
 ($ billions)




|  2002 |  2003 |  2004 |  2005 |  2006 |
| Net written premiums | $369.7 | $404.4 | $424.1 | $425.7 | $443.8 |
| Percent change | 14.3% | 9.4% | 4.9% | 0.3% | 4.3% |
| Earned premiums | $348.5 | $386.3 | $413.8 | $417.7 | $435.8 |
| Losses incurred | 238.8 | 238.7 | 247.8 | 256.3 | 231.1 |
| Loss adjustment expenses incurred | 44.8 | 50.0 | 53.1 | 55.1 | 52.6 |
| Other underwriting expenses | 93.8 | 100.7 | 106.8 | 109.8 | 117.5 |
| Policyholder dividends | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 3.4 |
| Underwriting gain/loss | -30.8 | -4.9 | 4.3 | -5.6 | 31.2 |
| Investment income | 37.2 | 38.6 | 40.0 | 49.7 | 52.3 |
| Miscellaneous income/loss | -0.8 | 0.0 | -0.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Operating income/loss | 5.6 | 33.8 | 44.0 | 45.1 | 84.6 |
| Realized capital gains/losses | -1.2 | 6.6 | 9.1 | 9.7 | 3.4 |
| Incurred federal income taxes/credit | 1.3 | 10.3 | 14.6 | 10.7 | 24.2 |
| Net income after taxes | 3.0 | 30.0 | 38.5 | 44.2 | 63.7 |
(1) Data in this chart may not agree with similar data shown elsewhere due to different sources.
Source: ISO. |
| - The U.S. property/casualty industry posted a $31.2 billion net gain on underwriting in 2006, driven by a sharp decline in catastrophe losses from hurricanes and other natural disasters that year. This contrasts with an underwriting loss of $5.6 billion the previous year.
|  |
 |
TOP TWENTY U.S. PROPERTY/CASUALTY COMPANIES BY REVENUES, 2007 (1)
 ($ millions)

 Rank |  Group |  Revenues |  Assets |
| 1 | Berkshire Hathaway | $118,245 | $273,160 |
| 2 | American International Group | 110,064 | 1,060,505 |
| 3 | State Farm Insurance Cos. | 61,612 | 181,422 |
| 4 | Allstate | 36,769 | 156,408 |
| 5 | Travelers Cos. | 26,017 | 115,224 |
| 6 | Liberty Mutual Insurance Group | 25,961 | 94,679 |
| 7 | Hartford Financial Services | 25,916 | 360,361 |
| 8 | Nationwide | 22,962 | 161,090 |
| 9 | Loews | 17,920 | 76,079 |
| 10 | Progressive | 14,687 | 18,843 |
| 11 | United Services Automobile Assn. | 14,418 | 67,177 |
| 12 | Chubb | 14,107 | 50,574 |
| 13 | Assurant | 8,454 | 26,750 |
| 14 | First American Corp. | 8,196 | 8,648 |
| 15 | American Family Insurance Group | 6,969 | 16,004 |
| 16 | Safeco | 6,209 | 12,640 |
| 17 | W.R. Berkley | 5,554 | 16,832 |
| 18 | Fidelity National Financial | 5,524 | 7,556 |
| 19 | Auto-Owners Insurance | 5,129 | 13,680 |
| 20 | Erie Insurance Group | 4,737 | 14,215 |
(1) Revenues for insurance companies include premium and annuity income, investment income and capital gains or losses but exclude deposits.
Source: Fortune. |
|  |
 |
DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS
 Property/casualty (P/C) insurance companies can be grouped into two main categories based on their main distribution channel: agency writers; whose products are sold by independent agents or brokers, representing several companies—and direct writers—which sell their own products through captive agents, by mail, telephone, the Internet and other means. There is a degree of overlap as many insurers use multiple channels.
- In 2006 agency writers accounted for 52.3 percent of P/C insurance net premiums written, direct writers accounted for 47.4 percent and other types of writers accounted for 0.3 percent, according to A.M. Best.
- In the personal lines market, direct writers accounted for 66.9 percent of net premiums written in 2006, agency writers accounted for 33.0 percent and other types of writers accounted for 0.1 percent.
- The same year agency writers accounted for 70.3 percent of commercial P/C net premiums written, direct writers accounted for 29.3 percent and other types of writers accounted for 0.4 percent.
Traditionally, there has been a distinction between agents and brokers, with agents (whether captive or independent) representing the insurance company and brokers representing the client. Recently, the line between agencies and brokers has blurred, with intermediary firms operating as brokers and agents, depending on their jurisdiction and the type of risk.
|  |
 |
TOP TEN COMMERCIAL INSURANCE BROKERS OF U.S. BUSINESS BY REVENUES, 2006 (1)
 ($ millions)

 Rank |  Company |  Brokerage revenues |
| 1 | Marsh & McLennan Cos. Inc. | $5,341.7 |
| 2 | Aon Corp. | 2,750.7 |
| 3 | Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 1,250.9 |
| 4 | Willis Group Holdings Ltd. | 1,100.3 |
| 5 | Wells Fargo Insurance Services Inc. | 1,008.7 |
| 6 | Brown & Brown Inc. | 864.7 |
| 7 | BB&T Insurance Services Inc. | 842.3 |
| 8 | Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. | 682.8 |
| 9 | USI Holdings Corp. | 546.3 |
| 10 | Lockton Cos. LLC | 453.4 (2) |
(1) Companies that derive more than 20 percent of revenues, generated by U.S.-based clients, from commercial retail brokerage. (2) Fiscal year ending April 30.
Source: Business Insurance, July 16, 2007. |
|  |
 |
PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURANCE INDUSTRY CONCENTRATION

|  |
 |
According to ISO, concentration in the property/casualty insurance sector increased from 229 in 1980 to 344 in 2006 on the Herfindahl scale, used to measure market concentration. The U.S. Department of Justice classifies any score under 1,000 as unconcentrated. A score over 1,800 means an industry is highly concentrated.
|  |
 |
MARKET SHARE TRENDS BY SIZE OF INSURER, 1986-2006 (1)



(1) Based on net premiums written, excluding state funds.
Source: ISO.

|  |
 | |
|
|
|
|
|