Directors And Officers Liability Insurance
Directors and officers liability insurance (D&O) covers directors and officers of a company for negligent acts or omissions and for misleading statements that result in suits against the company. There are various forms of D&O coverage. Corporate reimbursement coverage indemnifies directors and officers of the organization. Side-A coverage provides D&O coverage for personal liability when directors and officers are not indemnified by the firm. Entity coverage for claims made specifically against the company is also available. D&O policies may be broadened to include coverage for employment practices liability (EPL). EPL coverage may also be purchased as a stand-alone policy.
Sixty-three percent of corporations purchased D&O coverage in 2015, according to the 2016 RIMS Benchmark Survey from the Risk and Insurance Management Society, based on a survey of 1,248 organizations. Banks were the most likely to purchase D&O coverage, with 88 percent of industry respondents purchasing the coverage, followed by 86 percent of respondents in telecommunication services. JLT Specialty’s 2015 U.S. Directors and Officers Liability Survey of 157 U.S. organizations that purchase D&O liability insurance found that the group’s average D&O limit
s that were purchased was $131 million and the median limit purchased was $105 million. For public companies the average limit was $170 million. For private companies the average was $98 million. Twenty-four percent of public companies and 17 percent of private companies increased their D&O limits from their previous purchase. According to the 2014 survey 31 percent of respondents reported having had a claim in the past five years, with nonprofits reporting the highest proportion of claims (58 percent).
Types Of Directors And Officers Liability Claims By Ownership, 2011-2014 (1)
In addition to the risk of natural disasters, the insurance industry faces the threat of terrorist attacks. Losses stemming from the destruction of the World Trade Center and other buildings by terrorists on September 11, 2001 totaled about $32.5 billion, including commercial liability and group life insurance claims -- not adjusted for inflation -- or $35.9 billion in 2005 dollars. About two thirds of these losses were paid for by reinsurers, companies that provide insurance for insurers.
Prior to September 11, insurers provided terrorism coverage to their commercial insurance customers essentially free of charge because the chance of property damage from terrorist acts was considered remote. After September 11, insurers began to reassess the risk. For a while terrorism coverage was scarce. Reinsurers were unwilling to reinsure policies in urban areas perceived to be vulnerable to attack. Primary insurers filed requests with their state insurance departments for permission to exclude terrorism coverage from their commercial policies.
Concerned about the limited availability of terrorism coverage in high risk areas and its impact on the economy, Congress passed the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA). The Act provides a temporary program that, in the event of major terrorist attack, allows the insurance industry and federal government to share losses according to a specific formula. TRIA was signed into law on November 26, 2002.and renewed again for two years in December 2005. Passage of TRIA enabled a market for terrorism insurance to begin to develop because the federal backstop effectively limits insurers’ losses, greatly simplifying the underwriting process. TRIA was extended for another seven years to 2014 in December 2007. The new law is known as the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (TRIPRA) of 2007.
See /media/hottopics/insurance/terrorism/ for further information
Employment Practices Liability
Employment practices liability insurance provides protection for an employer against claims made by employees, former employees or potential employees. It covers discrimination (age, sex, race, disability, etc.), wrongful termination of employment, sexual harassment and other employment-related allegations and lawsuits.
Discrimination and wrongful employee dismissal or termination were the most frequently cited employment-related claims in the 2004 Tillinghast survey of more than 2,400 U.S. and Canadian corporations.
The chart below shows trends in jury awards in employment practices liability cases.
Trends In Employment Practices Liability, 2010-2014
Excess casualty insurance, also known as excess liability insurance, which provides protection from infrequent catastrophic accidents or occurrences, is similar to umbrella liability coverage, which also increases the liability protection provided by a company’s insurance policies. The main difference between excess and umbrella policies is that umbrella policies cover all underlying liability policies, whereas excess casualty policies increase the limits of liability on one particular policy. Both types of policies are designed to cover large, infrequent losses such as injuries caused by the collapse of a department store roof under the weight of a category 5 hurricane.
Each year the broker Marsh reviews the excess liability insurance-buying decisions of more than 4,000 organizations worldwide, including some 2,800 U.S. companies. The chart below indicates the percentage of U.S. firms experiencing a loss of $5 million or more. Those that experienced such a loss tended to purchase much higher limits of liability coverage.
U.S. FIRMS EXPERIENCING A LOSS OF $5 MILLION OR MORE, 2004-2008 (1)
Other Specialty Lines
There are a wide variety of insurance policies that cover special risks not insured under the more common forms of commercial insurance. “The Insurance Marketplace,” a directory of specialty providers produced each year by Rough Notes, listed over 600 specialty coverages, ranging from acupuncture specialists liability to kidnap/ransom insurance to special events liability in its latest directory.
Nonadmitted Direct Premiums Written For The Top 10 U.S. Surplus Lines Writers, 2011-2015