Background on: Earthquake insurance and risk

Overview

An earthquake is a sudden and rapid shaking of the earth caused by the breaking and shifting of rock beneath the earth’s surface. This shaking can sometimes trigger landslides, avalanches, flash floods, fires and tsunamis.

Millions of people across 42 states are at risk for damage from an earthquake, yet few purchase earthquake insurance to protect their property.

The potential cost of earthquakes has been growing because of increasing urban development in seismically active areas and the vulnerability of older buildings, which may not have been built or upgraded to current building codes.

Earthquake insurance

Earthquakes in the United States are not covered under standard homeowners or business insurance policies. Coverage is available either in the form of an endorsement or as a separate policy for homeowners, renters and small business owners.

Unlike flood insurance, earthquake coverage is available from private insurance companies rather than from the government. Coverage for other kinds of damage that may result from earthquakes, such as fire and water damage due to burst gas and water pipes, is provided by standard home and business insurance policies in most states. Cars and other vehicles are covered for earthquake damage by comprehensive insurance which also provides protection against flood and hurricane damage as well as theft.

Insurers that don’t sell earthquake insurance may still be impacted by these catastrophes due to losses from fire following a quake. These losses could involve claims for business interruption and additional living expenses as well. Cars and other vehicles are covered for earthquake damage under the comprehensive part of the auto insurance policy.

Just eight percent of homeowners responding to a May 2016 poll by the Insurance Information Institute said they have earthquake insurance. Homeowners in the West were most likely to have earthquake insurance with 14 percent saying they had the coverage followed by the Midwest at 7 percent; and the South and Northeast at 6 percent.

Deductibles and Costs: Earthquake insurance carries a deductible, generally in the form of a percentage rather than a dollar amount. Deductibles can range anywhere from 2 percent to 20 percent of the replacement value of the structure. This means that if it cost $100,000 to rebuild a home and there was 2 percent deductible, the consumer would be responsible for the first $2,000 dollars. Insurers in states like Washington, Nevada and Utah, with higher than average risk of earthquakes, often set minimum deductibles at around 10 percent. In most cases, consumers can get higher deductibles to save money on earthquake premiums.

Premiums also differ widely by location, insurer and the type of structure that is covered. Generally, older buildings cost more to insure than new ones. Wood frame structures generally benefit from lower rates than brick buildings because they tend to withstand quake stresses better. Regions are graded on a scale of 1 to 5 for likelihood of quakes, and this may be reflected in insurance rates offered in those areas. The cost of earthquake insurance is calculated on “per $1,000 basis.” For instance, a frame house in the Pacific Northwest might cost between one to three dollars per $1,000 worth of coverage, while it may cost less than fifty cents per $1,000 on the East coast.

A brick home would cost approximately $3 to $15 dollars per $1,000 in the Pacific Northwest, while it would cost between 60 to 90 cents in New York. Earthquake insurance is available from most insurance companies in most states. California law requires homeowners insurance companies to offer earthquake coverage to their homeowners insurance policyholders. Homeowners can decide to purchase it, purchase a policy from another insurer or decline it altogether.

The California Earthquake Authority

In January 1994 when the Northridge earthquake, a magnitude 6.8 quake, struck Southern California, causing an estimated $25.6 billion (in 2017 dollars) in insured losses, the insurance industry ended up paying out more in claims for this quake than it had collected in earthquake premiums over the preceding 30 years. While no insurer became insolvent, some came very close.

To recover their financial strength and to be better prepared for the next earthquake, most insurers began to limit their exposure to earthquakes by writing fewer new homeowners insurance policies. In addition, most insurers filed for both rate increases and increases in deductibles from the 10 percent that was current then to 15 percent or higher. This triggered a crisis that by mid-1996 threatened the vitality of the state’s housing market and stalled the state’s recovery from recession.

In 1996 the California Legislature established the California Earthquake Authority (CEA) as a publicly managed, largely privately funded entity. The CEA is now the largest provider of earthquake insurance in the U.S., with more than 1 million policies in force in California at the end of 2017.

The standard CEA policy includes a deductible that is 15 percent of the home’s replacement cost. The basic policy covers only the house (other structures such as garages, pools, etc. are not covered). Personal possessions are covered up to $5,000 and “loss of use” expenses, the additional cost of living elsewhere while home repairs are made, are covered up to $1,500. Recognizing that some people want more comprehensive coverage, the CEA also offers a 10 percent deductible, insurance for other structures, personal items coverage up to $100,000 and $15,000 in “loss of use” coverage. Premiums vary widely among the 19 rating territories, based on the type of house, its age, the nature of the soil, and proximity to known fault lines. The CEA has reserves of about $9 billion.

Where Do Earthquakes Occur?

For hundreds of millions of years, the forces of plate tectonics have shaped the earth as the huge plates that form the Earth's surface move slowly over, under, and past each other.

Sometimes the movement is gradual. At other times, the plates are locked together, unable to move. When the pressure building up grows strong enough, the plates break free causing the ground to shake and rupture along fault lines, or zones of weakness.

One of the most famous faults is the San Andreas Fault, which extends about 600 miles from the Gulf of California northwest along the California coast. The 1906 San Francisco earthquake was caused by movement of the San Andreas Fault.

Quakes can produce different kinds of shaking. Some, like the 6.8 magnitude (see section on Earthquake Measurement) Northridge quake, are thrust fault quakes, which cause violent up-and-down, rather than the more common side-to-side movement. Ground shaking from earthquakes can collapse buildings and bridges as well as trigger landslides, avalanches, floods, fires, and tsunamis. Buildings with foundations resting on unconsolidated landfill and other unstable soil, and trailers and homes not tied to their foundations are at risk because they can be shaken off their mountings during an earthquake.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, there are more than three million earthquakes worldwide each year. While the vast majority of those are a magnitude 3.9 or lower, more than 900 earthquakes measure 5.0 or higher each year. About 81 percent of the world’s largest earthquakes occur in the Circum-Pacific seismic belt. The area extends from Chile, northward along the western South American coast through Central America, Mexico, the west coast of the United States and the southern part of Alaska, through the Aleutian Islands to Japan, the Philippine Islands, New Guinea, the island groups of the Southwest Pacific and to New Zealand.

The most powerful earthquake on record occurred in Chile on May 22, 1960. The magnitude 9.5 quake caused $550 million in damage, killed more than 2,000 people and injured more than 3,000. It also caused a tsunami, which caused additional destruction in Hawaii, Japan, the Philippines and the West coast of the United States.

Earthquake Risk in the United States

A 2014 U.S. Geological Survey report found that 42 states have a reasonable chance of experiencing damaging earthquake. The 16 states at highest risk of quakes are Alaska, Arkansas, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

The 8 states that did not have significant hazard levels are Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota and Wisconsin.

In the continental United States, earthquakes occur most frequently west of the Rocky Mountains. Historically, the most violent earthquakes have occurred in the central United States. The largest earthquake in the continental United States was along the New Madrid Fault in Missouri, where a three-month long series of quakes in 1811-1812 included three quakes larger than a magnitude of 8. The state with the most major earthquakes is Alaska, but the one with the most damaging earthquakes is California.

Earthquake Risk in the Western United States: Although the entire Northwest of the United States is at high risk of earthquakes, eight of the 10 costliest earthquakes in the last century occurred in California. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, there is a 72 percent probability that an earthquake of magnitude 6.7 or larger will strike the San Francisco Bay area over the next 30 years.

Earthquake Risk in the Central United States: The New Madrid Fault zone lies within the central Mississippi valley extending from northeastern Arkansas through southeastern Missouri, western Tennessee, Kentucky and southern Illinois. The last major earthquake, magnitude 8, occurred there in 1812. But scientists warn that this was not a freak occurrence. Earthquakes in central and eastern United States affect much larger areas than earthquakes of similar magnitude in the West. For example, the San Francisco earthquake of 1906 was felt 350 miles away, whereas the New Madrid earthquake of December 1811 rang church bells in Boston, Massachusetts, 1,000 miles away.

Earthquake Risk in the Eastern United States: The largest earthquake in the East was a 7.5 temblor that struck Charleston, South Carolina, in 1886, killing over 60 people. While the risk of an earthquake in the Northeast is not nearly as high as in the West, the region is seismically active. A 6.0 earthquake struck Boston in 1755 and a 5.8 earthquake struck the northern part of New York State in 1944. Near New York City, there have been two 5.0 to 5.3 earthquakes, one in 1737 and the other in 1884. Experts say an earthquake of between 6.5 and 7.5 in possible in the Northeast but estimate that it may occur “in the order of thousands of years.”

Applied Insurance Research, a catastrophe modeling firm, points out that large numbers of buildings in both Boston and New York City were built long before the introduction of seismic building codes. Many of the older structures in the two cities are made of unreinforced masonry, the most vulnerable to earthquake damage. Worse, much of Boston is built on artificial fill, which can amplify seismic waves by as much as a factor of three. New York is less vulnerable, being largely built on bedrock.

Economic Losses from Earthquakes

The largest earthquake in the United States was a magnitude 9.2 quake that struck Alaska on March 28, 1964. The earthquake and ensuing tsunami caused more than $500 million in property losses, according to the National Geophysical Data Center.

The costliest earthquake in the U.S. was the Northridge, California, earthquake of January 17, 1994, with insured losses estimated at $15.3 billion, according to ISO ($25.6 billion in 2017 dollars).

The San Francisco Earthquake of 1906, would have caused insured losses of up to $105 billion, were the quake to hit under current economic and demographic conditions.

A 2017 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) study estimated that over time earthquake losses in the United States could average $6.14 billion dollars a year. This estimate includes only capital losses, such as repairing or replacing buildings, contents and inventory, and loss of income, including business interruption, rental income and wage losses. It does not cover damage and losses to critical facilities, transportation and utility lines or indirect economic losses.

The report points out that the potential cost of earthquakes has been growing because of increasing urban development in seismically active areas, the vulnerability of older buildings, which may not have been built or upgraded to current building codes, and an increased interdependency in terms of supply and demand for the businesses that operate among different parts of the world.

While the majority of potential economic loss is concentrated along the West Coast, the distribution of relative earthquake risk is much broader and reinforces the fact that earthquakes are a national problem. There are relatively high earthquake loss ratios throughout the western and central United States and in the Charleston, South Carolina area, according to the study.

The study pointed out the need for increased recognition of metropolitan areas with “low seismic hazard” but “high seismic risk,” such as New York City and Boston, which have high concentrations of buildings and an infrastructure that was built without taking into account seismic codes. Although the likelihood of catastrophic quakes occurring in these areas is statistically low, the potential cost is very high. In addition, because of the perception of low risk, neither the public nor the private sector has developed earthquake preparedness programs that teach people how to protect against earthquake damage and injury.

Earthquake Measurement

The size and magnitude of an earthquake is measured in several different ways. The Richter Scale measures the size of earthquake waves. It was developed by Charles Richter in the 1930s and is a logarithmic measurement of the amount of energy released by an earthquake, see below. The Mercalli Intensity Scale evaluates the intensity of a quake according to observed severity at specific locations. It rates the intensity on a Roman numeral scale that ranges from I to XII. Today, seismologists are using the Moment Magnitude Scale, which measures the size of the earthquake’s fault, and how much of the earth slips at the time of the quake. A number of readings are taken, averaged and then adjusted to generate numbers similar to the Richter Scale. This allows the magnitude of earthquakes measured on these new scales to be compared with earthquakes recorded earlier. According to the Moment Magnitude Scale, the severity of an earthquake is categorized as the following:

5.0 Small
5.0 – 6.0 Moderate
6.0 – 7.0 Large
7.0 - 7.8 Major
7.8 Great

An increase of one unit of magnitude, for example, from a 4.0 to a 5.0 quake, is a 10-fold increase in wave amplitude on a seismogram, or about a 30-fold increase in energy released. Thus, the difference between a 4.0 and a 6.0 magnitude quake would be a release of energy 900 times (30 times 30) as great as a 4.0 magnitude quake since the magnitude is a logarithmic value.

Earthquake Safety/Loss Mitigation

Although earthquakes cannot be prevented, science and engineering provide tools that can be used to reduce their damage. Science can now identify, with considerable accuracy, where earthquakes are likely to occur and what forces they will generate. Engineering can help provide design and construction techniques so that buildings and other structures can survive the tremendous forces of earthquakes.

To produce estimates of earthquake loss by geographic area, FEMA uses an earthquake loss estimation methodology called Hazards U.S. (HAZUS), developed in cooperation with the National Institute of Building Sciences. The loss estimation methodology is a software program that uses mathematical formulas and information about building stock, local geology and the location and size of potential earthquakes, economic data, and other information to estimate losses from a potential earthquake. HAZUS is capable of using two separate geographic information systems (MapInfo® and ArcView®) to map and display ground shaking, the pattern of building damage, and demographic information about a community. Once the location and size of a hypothetical earthquake is identified, HAZUS will estimate the violence of ground shaking, the number of buildings damaged, the number of casualties, the amount of damage to transportation systems, disruption to the electrical and water utilities, the number of people displaced from their homes, and the estimated cost of repairing projected damage and other effects.

Legislation

In 1977 the United States Congress enacted the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act, in recognition of the fact that earthquakes pose the greatest potential threat of any single-event natural hazard confronting the nation. The Act directed the President to "establish and maintain an effective earthquake hazards reduction program."

Congress then created the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, which gave lead responsibility to the federal government to provide direction, coordination, research and other support to efforts aimed at earthquake hazard mitigation and preparedness. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the United States Geological Survey, the National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology were assigned specific roles. Recommendations were included on the duties of state governments, local governments, private organizations and individuals.

Induced Earthquakes

Hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as fracking, is a drilling technique used to extract natural gas and oil from the ground. The process involves the disposal of wastewater by injecting it deep into the earth. There is evidence that the wastewater disposal process has contributed to an increase in the number of earthquakes.

The spate of earthquakes in Oklahoma over the last few years, including the 5.8 magnitude Pawnee quake in 2016, has been linked to the disposal of wastewater from oil production. Earthquake insurance take-up rates in Oklahoma have been increasing as a result of the quakes.

Earthquake Risk and Nuclear Plant Safety in the U.S.

In January 2012 the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the U.S. Department of Energy and the Electric Power Research Institute released a seismic study and model intended to help nuclear power plants in the central and eastern parts of the U.S. reassess their vulnerability to earthquakes. The study found that nuclear reactors in the region face bigger threats from big earthquakes than were previously recognized. The model, which came out of the study, replaces previous models used by the government and the nuclear power industry since the late 1980s. The NRC will require nuclear plant operators to conduct new studies for all 96 reactors in the regions.

Charts and Graphs

Top 10 Costliest U.S. Earthquakes By Inflation-Adjusted Insured Losses (1)

($ millions)

        Insured losses (2)  
Rank Date Location Overall losses
when occurred
Dollars
when
occurred
In 2017
dollars (3)
Fatalities
1 Jan. 17, 1994 California: Northridge, Los Angeles,
San Fernando Valley, Ventura, Orange
$44,000 $15,300 $25,635 61
2 Apr. 18, 1906 California: San Francisco, Santa Rosa, San Jose 525 180 4,499 (4) 3,000
3 Oct. 17, 1989 California: Loma Prieta, Santa Cruz, San Francisco,
Oakland, Berkeley, Silicon Valley
10,000 960 1,872 68
4 Feb. 28, 2001 Washington: Olympia, Seattle, Tacoma; Oregon 2,000 300 418 1
5 Mar. 27-28, 1964 Alaska: Anchorage, Kodiak Island, Seward, Valdez,
Portage, Whittier, Cordova, Homer, Seldovia
540 45 357 131
6 Feb. 9, 1971 California: San Fernando Valley, Los Angeles 550 35 215 65
7 Oct. 1, 1987 California: Los Angeles, Whittier 360 75 159 8
8 Aug. 24, 2014 California: Napa, Vallejo, Solano, Sonoma,
American Canyon
700 150 154 1
9 Apr. 4, 2010 California: San Diego, Calexico, El Centro, Los Angeles,
Imperial; Arizona: Phoenix, Yuma
150 100 112 0
10 Sep. 3, 2000 California: Napa 80 50 71 0

(1) Costliest U.S. earthquakes occurring from 1950 to 2017, based on insured losses when occurred. Includes the 1906 San Francisco, California, earthquake, for which reliable insured losses are available.
(2) Based on property losses including, if applicable, agricultural, offshore, marine, aviation and National Flood Insurance Program losses in the United States and may differ from data shown elsewhere.
(3) Inflation-adjusted to 2017 dollars by the Insurance Information Institute using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Inflation Calculator.
(4) Inflation-adjusted to 2017 dollars based on 1913 Bureau of Labor Statistics data (earliest year available).

Source: © 2018 Munich Re, NatCatSERVICE; Insurance Information Institute.

View Archived Tables

Top 10 Costliest World Earthquakes And Tsunamis By Insured Losses, 1980-2017 (1)

($ millions)

      Losses when occurred  
Rank Date Location Overall Insured (2) Fatalities
1 Mar. 11, 2011 Japan: Aomori, Chiba, Fukushima, lbaraki, lwate, Miyagi, Tochigi, Tokyo, Yamagata. Includes tsunami. $210,000 $40,000 15,880
2 Feb. 22, 2011 New Zealand: Canterbury, Christchurch, Lyttelton 24,000 16,500 185
3 Jan. 17, 1994 USA (CA): Northridge, Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, Ventura, Orange 44,000 15,300 61
4 Feb. 27, 2010 Chile: Concepcion, Metropolitana, Rancagua, Talca, Temuco, Valparaiso. Includes tsunami. 30,000 8,000 520
5 Sep. 4, 2010 New Zealand: Canterbury, Christchurch, Avonside, Omihi, Timaru, Kaiapoi, Lyttelton 10,000 7,400 0
6 Apr. 14-16, 2016 Japan: Kumamoto, Aso, Chuo Ward, Mashiki, Minamiaso, Oita, Miyazaki, Fukuoka, Yamaguchi 32,000 6,200 205
7 Jan. 17, 1995 Japan: Hyogo, Kobe, Osaka, Kyoto 100,000 3,000 6,430
8 Nov. 13, 2016 New Zealand: Canterbury, Kaikoura, Waiau, Wellington, Marlborough, Picton 3,900 2,100 2
9 Jun. 13, 2011 New Zealand: Canterbury, Christchurch, Lyttelton 2,700 2,100 1
10 Sep. 19, 2017 Mexico: Puebla, Morelos, Greater Mexico City 6,000 2,000 369

(1) As of January 2018. Ranked on insured losses when occurred.
(2) Based on property losses including, if applicable, agricultural, offshore, marine, aviation and National Flood Insurance Program losses in the United States and may differ from data shown elsewhere.

Source: © 2018 Munich Re, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE; Wikipedia.

View Archived Tables

Top Ten Deadliest World Earthquakes/Tsunamis, 1980-2015 (1)

($ millions)

      Losses when occurred
Rank Date Location Overall Insured Fatalities
1 Dec. 26, 2004 Indonesia; India; Sri Lanka; Thailand; Maldives;
Myanmar; Bangladesh; Malaysia. Includes tsunami.
$10,000 $1,000 220,000
2 Jan. 12, 2010 Haiti (esp. Port-au-Prince) 8,000 200 159,000
3 Oct. 8, 2005 Pakistan; India 5,200 5 88,000
4 May 12, 2008 China (Sichuan) 85,000 300 84,000
5 Jun. 20, 1990 Iran (esp. Manjil, Rudbar) 7,100 100 40,000
6 Dec. 26, 2003 Iran (esp. Bam) 500 20 26,200
7 Dec. 7, 1988 Armenia (esp. Spitak) 14,000 NA 25,000
8 Aug. 17, 1999 Turkey (esp. Izmit) 12,000 600 17,120
9 Mar. 3, 2011 Japan (Honshu).  Includes tsunami. 210,000 40,000 15,840
10 Jan. 26, 2001 India (Gujarat); Pakistan 4,600 100 14,970

(1) As of June 2016.

NA=Data not available.

Source: © 2016 Munich Re, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE.

Additional resources

United States Geological Survey, Earthquake Facts & Earthquake Fantasy

Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety, Earthquake Resources

 

© Insurance Information Institute, Inc. - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Back to top

Disasters + Preparedness
Preparing for an earthquake
Disasters + Preparedness
Recovering from an earthquake